Peer Review Process
Manuscripts submitted will be evaluated by reviewers using the peer review method for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation.
The editor will provide information on the results of the review in the shortest possible time, which is between 1 to 3 weeks. Please note that the process of reviewing manuscripts submitted to the SAMBARA (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) will most likely be reviewed for approximately 4 weeks. The editor will evaluate submitted manuscripts according to the focus and scope of SAMBARA:Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. If a discrepancy is found with the focus and scope, the editor has the right to reject the submitted manuscript.
Reviewers review the manuscript from the aspect of quality and substance of writing (not the use of grammar), which includes renewal, originality, usability, and validity of citations and bibliographies.
The reviewer carries out the review process using the peer review method from the editor or editorial secretariat. If it is not in accordance with the competence and scientific field, the reviewer has the right to refuse and recommend the manuscript to other people who are more suitable.
The editorial board's decision is absolute and all submitted articles will be replied to via email with the following decisions:
1. Accepted for publication
2. Accepted with slight revision
3. Accepted with major revision
4. Rejected / unpublishable
Based on the opinion of the editorial board on points 1 to 3, the manuscript can be assigned by the reviewer to carry out the article review stage, the editor will give the final decision to the author.
The manuscript revision period is one week and must be sent back to the editor via OJS (Open Journal System). If the revised manuscript exceeds the specified limit given, it is considered resigned, the editor will reject the manuscript.
Using Peer Reviews